They offer different flash templates with latest features.
Login

Forgot password
Register
Latest changes

The idea module was updated:

  • We now have 10 statuses instead of 5
  • The review process now involves both moderators and developers
  • Moderators can now review form and content separately
  • Moderators can now delegate decisions to developers when they are unable to assess the pertinence or feasibility of an idea
Improve this website
  • Report bugs here.
  • Register ideas for improvements using the idea module on this website.
Back

 acroread

Adobe reader
60MB
Categories: Releases: Score:
 -82
149 reviews
Description:

Adobe reader allows you to view navigate and print pdf files. this version adds advanced forms support (save), better integration with adobe acrobat workflows, customizable toolbars and better overall performance.

this package provides the english version of adobe reader 9.

User reviews:
ScoreComment
1 day ago

ericvictor66
4 fast and do all i need
1 week ago

RemuN
1 awful
1 month ago

benlz
5 It's not free, but it's perfectly compatible, ultra-light and fast, while Evince is so much slower on my machine.. as I can see, Okular is the only valid free alternative to Acroread.
1 month ago

viniciusguanais
2 Tem ferramentas de comentário mas não funcionam.
1 month ago

apicus
2 Lourd, souvent lent. Les outils linux sont meilleurs, alors pourquoi s'encombrer de celui-là d'autant qu'Adobe ne supporte plus lesversions Linux.
2 months ago

Angeltoast
4 Installed quickly, loads large files easily and fast, and has all the features I need.
2 months ago

neptunium
2 Too slow, also Adobe does not support linux anymore!
2 months ago

zapbuzz
4 its just a pity nuthin open is as reliable lol
2 months ago

tjnic
4 There are a lot of very sill comments on here. For many official PDF Documents, this really is the only software that works 100% of the time. I would love it to be open, but is isn't - Get over it!
2 months ago

beirapadua
1 okular puts this thing to shame
4 months ago

yayosry
1 so bad, after tryng some pdf viewers i recomendpdf-xchange on playonlinux
5 months ago

jahid_0903014
1 Annoying
6 months ago

RytronII
1 Not needed since Evince and many other apps do a far better job.
6 months ago

photoao
1 Avoiding anything adobe like the plague. Moreover it's horribly bloated, wasting resources even on a powerful machine is still a waste, Evince and epdfviewer are much better and free. Need to fill forms or write above ANY pdf ? take inkscape
6 months ago

vahid123
1 too slow . besides, adobe have some problem with iran
8 months ago

AvanOsch
1 Security problems all over the place!!! Adobe don't care about Linux users!
9 months ago

francheu
2 autant utiliser pdfxchange ou foxitpdf sous wine
9 months ago

Sweyn78
2 Bloatware. Use FoxitPDF or another non-bloated alternative.
9 months ago

fotonix
1 Adobe was a big factor in leaving Windoze. Don't contaminate your Linux with this.
10 months ago

banders
5 I was so happy to learn I could just install Adobe Reader right out of Software Manager, instead of having to put up with whatever other PDF reader came standard. Adobe's PDF reader is great, I've used it for years. I highly recommend it to everyone.
10 months ago

webgiant
5 I've always enjoyed Adobe Reader, as it has all the features I need in a PDF reader, and it is free. I especially like acroread as it runs natively in Linux, no need to be dependent on an inferior OS just to have a full-featured PDF reader. I'm glad that this is featured software, and I don't see what all the whining is about.
10 months ago

ivan7
1 Should not be featured software!
10 months ago

rompro
1 not good
11 months ago

Qruqs
1 Adobe has become the wee brother to M$, where they lock everything up, and charge a ridiculous amount of money for it. Never again an Adobe product.
1 year ago

bliving
1 Poor security posture for an open document standard
1 year ago

newpaul
5 In the Windows community (?), I never understood the bad press Adobe Reader used to receive, and still receives, in favor of much inferior tools, just because those were “lighter” (some people evaluate software as if the limits of their hardware, system setup or skills level didn't count). I see that in Linux this lasting fad also caught. I'm sorry to crash the negative party, but I think Acroread/Adobe Reader for Linux is a very good tool, and manages to emulate the reading experience of a book or magazine for the digital environment. Great for M12 Lisa 64bit. [The program was updated for Linux on April 16, 2012; its supposed “slowness” is the flip side of its greater definition, in comparison to the default Document Viewer; but right now it suffers from an irritating bug that presents you the license dialog every time a document is opened.]
1 year ago

wujj123456
1 @newpaul I agree that Adobe Reader X is usable under Windows, but you must haven't used Foxit Reader. It just beats Adobe Reader X on every dimension. In addition, it's also 100% free. For people want more advance features (e.g. highlight, annotation, drawing), just install Foxit Reader 5 using Wine. It runs much faster and smoother than Adobe Reader, even under Wine. So I don't think there is anything left fo anyone to defend Adobe Reader. Btw, avoid the inferior Foxit Reader for Linux 1.x.
1 year ago

hardlywired
1 Why is this featured software? This licensed bloatware doesn't belong in the linux world,. So many better readers out there with bookmarking.
1 year ago

Anacarnil
1 It is not the perfect solution for a Linux user. Truly.
1 year ago

fdR4T4eG2
1 bad. very bad: freezes, slows and all around bad.
1 year ago

aegony
1 really bad ... dear adobe!
1 year ago

JeffKnisley
5 I like for it lets me open Locked pdf files from my school no other pdf reader in the linux community will do that for me.
1 year ago

librelegal
2 no need to go unfree
1 year ago

OpenOs
1 the sick man
1 year ago

Kain
2 NOT a fan, but sometimes I need it to do real work. A lot of pdf from government sites don't seem to work well in other programs, and filling out forms with any other programs is a shot in the dark.
1 year ago

kneekoo
3 It's a good reader and prints very well. Still, it's overly bloated. It's just too much for a reader but at least it can natively handle all PDF features.
1 year ago

brian1037
5 Works just as well as the Windows version. Great for people who are coming from Windows and don't want a new PDF viewer.
1 year ago

icelure
3 作为第一个在这里留言的中国人，我表示压力山大。。。
1 year ago

Anleoje
1 Hay mejores.... más rápidos, estables. livianos y seguros! :/
1 year ago

wtlhk
1 Adobe products suck in linux environment
1 year ago

Hil002
1 Muy pesado el programa
1 year ago

carlosjimy
1 Existen alternativas mucho mejores. Evince lo supera con creces en funcionalidad, estabilidad y rapidez.
1 year ago

samyb2313
2 probleme d'affichage de document, parfois des pages noir
1 year ago

blueXrider
1 crap
1 year ago

killmess
1 Too slow, too big, too Bloated. :( Okular is MUCH BETTER.
1 year ago

jvbuxte
3 I would say OKULAR is better than AR
1 year ago

Squirrel
3 Slow, but it gets the job done.
1 year ago

mv288
1 too slow.
1 year ago

illinoismatt
4 Will display jpeg2000 images found in many google book downloads. Evince will not.
1 year ago

ihends
1 Super Suck, can't do anything with it.
1 year ago

Sinnfrage
1 Too fat and not nearly as nice as okular.
1 year ago

danfast
4 lo mejor
1 year ago

Mitzh
1 How can a program, which purpose is to read text files with images, be so bloated!!
1 year ago

uvas_1
1 pfssss
1 year ago

mchojrin
2 Too slow
1 year ago

Steampunk-Nick
2 useful tool, but i prefer Evince
1 year ago

bugz
4 LMDE: Opens fast 500p pdf's (default viewer thinks a lot). Nice b/w fullscreen mode.
1 year ago

ticiajosep
2 Hi ha opcions GPL millors.
1 year ago

armagast
2 Evince is much better
2 years ago

pazoff
3 A little bit slow
2 years ago

omena
3 ok
2 years ago

AlbertP
2 It's in fact a windows app in Wine. I prefer the default viewer of Mint, it's faster and more stable. Adobe's linux reader is only a last resort if anything else fails to open a file.
2 years ago

diei
4 I prefer it instead of the others viewers
2 years ago

ashtoash
2 Very heavy app
2 years ago

Rafson
3 works well, however there are better pdf viewers for linux which use less system resources
2 years ago

davy64
4 Mi Piace
2 years ago

mbnoimi
1 why you like?!
2 years ago

Belarus_IRus
1 Zachem?
2 years ago

pcornelissen
4 big and slow but opens "all" pdfs
2 years ago

paperclipguy
2 63MB?? For Real?? Can't even escape this stuff on linux. Acrobat's code is like a skyscraper built on top of a landfill, built on top of another landfill.
2 years ago

roguededguy
2 It's not fast or as stable as some other clients, but try filling out government tax forms without it.
2 years ago

Homitsu
2 It's old, fat and heavy. But sometimes you could need it.
2 years ago

roshan64
5 Good
2 years ago

mitanshugamer
1 crap. okalur is too much better
2 years ago

seifmint
5 Elisa
2 years ago

danirod
1 Why should I stop using my loved Evince and start using this non-free trash?
2 years ago

Ioseph
1 CPU hog. Much better stuff out there than this.
2 years ago

gorlaw
4 A bit of a resource hog
2 years ago

mactar
4 mactar c'est un soft pratique.
2 years ago

Le_Pat
4 Heavy perhaps, but the best in every respect
2 years ago

Derathor
1 I look for alternatives to the acroreader on EVERY platform. Its needlessly heavy for ANY system.Evince rocks! I even use it on my Windows 7 dual boot.This can only be useful if you REALLY need the extra features it brings.
2 years ago

numn
1 Im sorry but to find this here seems rather ironic ^^
2 years ago

rodolfo
3 Nice, but too heavy. You can do without.
2 years ago

Elisa
3 Good
2 years ago

wanda
1 Bhaaaaaa !.
2 years ago

historyb
5 Great
2 years ago

guv999
4 Never had any problems with this, does the job.
2 years ago

Xyie
4 I prefer evince, but I'd probably recommend this to new users already familiar with the software.
2 years ago

darrell09thomas
4 nice program and also free thanks acroread
2 years ago

akash211
3 a book looks better in adobe reader but it is not worth what space and resource it takes. evince and okular are much better.
2 years ago

xpert
5 Must have, best pdf reader with advanced features, great for productivity
2 years ago

JeanGrosJean
1 Evince, xpdf and Foxit for Linux, those are the three PDF readers I use. Acroread? Never!
2 years ago

PERCE-NEIGE
1 Everything but this horrible software, bugged, freezing, slow. Hey! There's free alternatives! You have the choice: Ghostscript, Xpdf, Sumatra, or addons for your browser (Foxit, etc..)
2 years ago

Wanderer
4 Works well for me. Second choice is Foxit Reader, it would be my first but some of the online forms my company uses experience difficulties with Foxit.
2 years ago

penguinuser
2 Doesn't work smoothly on 64-bit.
2 years ago

neoshock
4 must have
2 years ago

gioblack92
5 ottimo ma meglio preferire alternative open source
2 years ago

VeliciaL
1 Absolutely sluggish, my netbook barely runs it. Only use it for forms, unfortunately I haven't been able to find any other Linux reader that supports them.
2 years ago

adzik
3 Heavy, bloated and slow. But is needed if using some business documents with special forms, etc. Wouldn't use if didn't have to.
2 years ago

hellangel
1 same here
2 years ago

luisnando
1 Don't work properly
2 years ago

tihomir
3 Slow.Freezing from time to time.Use Evince instead.
2 years ago

pewamo357
5 i really like it
2 years ago

linux4test
1 too slow
2 years ago

Franzel
4 very large but is works
2 years ago

nebjak
2 To slow
2 years ago

tenshigo
5 Perfect visual quality.
2 years ago

jesica
3 dont really need it
2 years ago

NicolasRobidoux
5 robust printer interaction
2 years ago

akanashiro
3 Slooooow. We don't need it if we have Evince or Okular
2 years ago

emil_pavlov
1 very slow, okular is much better
2 years ago

oldnewboy
5 The best PDF reader!
2 years ago

akashtaker001
4 Heavy and bloated but no other useful alternative exists.
2 years ago

attack11
4 Essential for an x64 system.
2 years ago

Bluebird
4 Most populated
2 years ago

ashwinhgtx
1 Not required. Evince and Okular are better.
2 years ago

tamoghna4
3 more than 60 MB for a pdf reader! but works better than okular in a browser .
2 years ago

Khaled-Khalil
2 bloatware
2 years ago

Jac978
4 It is a good pdf reader.
2 years ago

nith_an
4 good till now
2 years ago

Dejmon
1 Absolutně nejhorší soft !!!!!
2 years ago

Zazama
4 Etwas zu langsam aber das beste in seiner Kategorie
2 years ago

na5h
3 Sorry, I didn't try to open multiple tabs (which doesn't seem to work too well). It appears to work just fine when opening a single document, though.
2 years ago

Celtique
1 failles, bugs c'est du adobe
2 years ago

limulus
1 Buggy, vulnerable, slow. Avoid like the plague.
2 years ago

Fuzzi99
1 worst app for reading .pdf even google chrome is better.
2 years ago

Melon_Bread
1 Crap, compared to other pdf readers
2 years ago

execellent23
4 more userfriendly so far....
2 years ago

amazingagain
4 the features are pretty impressive although just for basic reading and printing it would be better to go for a more basic reader as this is pretty slow , foxit reader in WINE is pretty good with tabs
2 years ago

satanatam
1 Looks like something alien
2 years ago

mikefreeman
3 The only PDF viewer I've found that can use tabs for different documents. Doesn't handle them nicely, though.
2 years ago

Ubutunix
1 Viel zu langsam und irgendwie uneffizient. Alternativen sind vorzuziehen.
2 years ago

svalbard
4 It may be bloated, but it supports tabs, which is worth it to me. On a decent system the bloat shouldn't be a huge concern.
2 years ago

artic112
2 Slow, looks like a bad port
2 years ago

linuxmint
3 It's ok but its really bloated. I would prefer other pdf readers.
2 years ago

haruspexed
2 only use if you really really need special functionality no other app provides
2 years ago

AndrewX192
2 Install it if you really *need* the extra functionality of Adobe Reader. Otherwise stay away from this program.
2 years ago

Harry
4 Install just for the better printout ability
3 years ago

farnaby
2 Fortunately, this heavy dinosaur becomes more and more dispensable. Still there are times when you might need it, because the open source alternatives fail.
3 years ago

hamburn
1 don't need Adobe
3 years ago

robertochile87
1 malo malo y no es gnu
3 years ago

bro3886
1 worst pdf reader
3 years ago

SeanBest
3 Runs great on my machine, prints much better than default reader, other than printing default reader is fine.
3 years ago

johngreth
4 Bloated, but prints better than the built in viewer
3 years ago

Xtigyro
2 functional but very slow and bloated
3 years ago

VICTOR360
1 we dont need this adobe unnecessarily bloated!
3 years ago

maty1206
1 What's this for? Are you joking me? Seriously, there is no reason for use a PDF destroyer like this. Close sourced and private software = Monopoly
3 years ago

distrohopper
2 With so many free and open source .pdf readers out there, there's really no need for this. I agree with Alexio, it's unnecessarily bloated.
3 years ago

Alexio
3 Very bloated and seems to eat resources for no real reason. It can offer a nice variety of features for reading, so it's a bit of a trade off.

Linux Mint | Blog | Forums
Copyright © 2009 . All Rights Reserved.