Title | Score |
---|
Software | Score |
---|---|
deluge "Simple and lightweight enough." |
5 |
gparted "Easy to use and does its job perfectly." |
5 |
opera "Slower than Chromium, not as powerfull as Firefox, not on a free license... Use it only if you must have a QT libary-based browser." |
3 |
cream "May become handy, but I would rather recommend learning pure VIM." |
3 |
vim "Single most powerfull text editor. Must-have!" |
5 |
rxvt-unicode "Lightweight and highly custiomisable." |
5 |
gnome-terminal "Fast enought and has every needed function. Unfortunatelly, it is hard to configure (you need to use gconf-editor to tune some of its options)." |
4 |
moc "Great UI, fast, doesn't require MPD. My fauvorite console music player." |
5 |
rhythmbox "It has all the features I need. It could be faster, though..." |
4 |
banshee "Great for organising music, excellent player. Unfortunatelly, it requires Mono." |
4 |
gnome-commander "Nice and powerfull, but somehow I prefer Midnight Commander." |
3 |
mc "Best console file manager." |
4 |
empathy "Prettier than Pidgin, but not nearly as usefull." |
2 |
pidgin "Many networks, lots of plugins (including one to make images from TeX formulas). Unreplaceable." |
5 |
chromium "Faster than Firefox, but not as expandable." |
4 |
firefox "Without plugins, it would be Chromium's heavier replacement. With plugins, it is simply the most powerfull web browser on the planet." |
5 |
gnome-mplayer "Not as good as VLC, but it doesn't need QT." |
4 |
vlc "Best media player for QT. Period." |
5 |
totem "Too simple for my needs. It also has problem with subtitles (they tend to dissapear)." |
3 |
xchat "Simple to use, but with all necessary functions." |
5 |
geany "Lightweight and simple IDE. Give it a try!" |
4 |